Emission and fees
Do rewards, emission and fees follow the spec?
flop economics --helpThe indexed miner fee differs.
Latest sampled miner payment: 0.99 FLOP. Target: 0.85 FLOP.
DRIFT compares the indexer with the pinned paper. It does not prove a runtime defect. Existing upstream report ↗
Last-known recording ·
Hosted MCP / indexer ↗ · 20 sampled settlements of 348 indexed · Paper 2a2cc82 ↗
Download raw observation ↓01 / The target schedule
Halve. Then keep the floor.
This is the pinned emission model. Scroll reveals the schedule, not observed issuance.
Observed head: 3,001,897. The gold marker locates that block on the model. Zero is unrewarded.
Supply and reward receipts: UNOBSERVABLE. The selected indexer fields contain no issuance or reward-distribution records.
02 / Calculate the rule
Exact amounts. Explicit assumptions.
The starting inputs come from the recording. Your edits are scenarios. Results use the pinned target and base-unit integer arithmetic.
Supply through a block
Genesis has no block reward. Gross supply is not circulating supply.
- Gross scheduled supply
- 4736212464 FLOP
- Reward at block
- 96 FLOP
- Subsidy per recipient at block
- 8 FLOP
- Cumulative reward / subsidy
- 288182112 / 48030352 FLOP
Follow an inference payment
Successful cooperative spot settlement. Inclusion fees and tips are separate.
Unassigned rounding dust: 0 base units. Burn: 0 FLOP. The audit allocation comes out of the validator pool.
The paper does not name the recipient of indivisible dust. The calculator floors each pool and keeps dust visible.
03 / Inspect the evidence
Which quantities can we compare?
Amounts below are exact base units. Each row keeps its source clause and explains its limits.
Showing 8 of 20 quantities.